Autorisation du vaccin COVID : erreurs ou complicités ?
📅 2022-06-13🎙️ Virginie Joron (MEP, Rassemblement National) — episode 2 of a multi-part series📺 Virginie Joron — YouTube channel⏱ 20 min
“No symptoms, no test, no Covid. We have three and a half times more antipyretic use in the vaccine group. That means I'm suppressing symptoms for three times as many people — so the 95% is wrong.”
Key statements
-
The primary efficacy endpoint — PCR-confirmed symptomatic COVID — is biased because symptom-reporting is participant-driven and antipyretics (paracetamol etc.) were permitted, suppressing symptoms. ▶ 01:46Sources: Pfizer C4591001 Protocol
-
Vaccine-group participants took antipyretics 3.5× more often than placebo-group participants. With suppressed symptoms came suppressed testing — and suppressed COVID case counts — artificially inflating the 95% headline. ▶ 02:36Sources: Pfizer C4591001 interim clinical study report (Dec 2020) — antipyretic use tables
-
PCR-confirmed symptomatic COVID is not representative of real-world infection. Anti-nucleocapsid serology — which would have caught asymptomatic and undetected cases — was not used to define the endpoint. ▶ 05:05Sources: Pfizer C4591001 Protocol
-
Pre-clinical monkey data and Phase 1-2 human data already showed neutralizing antibody decline after two months. In Phase 3, Pfizer performed no antibody titre measurement at three months — the time-point that would have shown waning protection. ▶ 05:39Sources: Pfizer C4591001 Protocol (immunogenicity schedule)
-
Pfizer was already studying a booster dose in December 2020 — the same month it was telling the public a two-dose regimen would restore normal life. They knew protection wouldn't last. ▶ 06:46Sources: Pfizer booster sub-study protocol (Dec 2020 amendment to C4591001)
-
GCP guidelines require extreme traceability (every data entry signed, audited server-room access, redundant air conditioning). All of that regulation, designed to protect trial participants and the public, was disregarded in the COVID trials. ▶ 11:11Sources: ICH-GCP guidelines
-
The European Commission ordered 4.2 billion doses for 447 million Europeans — roughly 8-9 doses per person. The order itself proves Brussels knew, from the start, that boosters would be needed. ▶ 14:07Sources: EU Advance Purchase Agreements (Pfizer/BioNTech)
-
Cotton flags the European Ombudsman's investigation into Ursula von der Leyen's undisclosed SMS messages with Pfizer's CEO Albert Bourla — still unresolved at recording. ▶ 17:32Sources: European Ombudsman decision OI/4/2022/PB
-
The Commission awarded McKinsey a 2.5 million euro contract for a 70-page report on "manufacturing options for medical countermeasures against serious cross-border health threats" during the crisis. ▶ 18:06Sources: EU Commission–McKinsey contract (2022, medical countermeasures study)
-
Conflict-of-interest pattern: vdL's son works at McKinsey; her husband is a senior officer of a Maastricht-region pharmaceutical company in the Pfizer network. The EU Transparency Register also shows recurring vdL meetings with Bill Gates, Global Citizen, and Open Society. ▶ 18:44Sources: EU Transparency Register (vdL meeting log)
Documents cited
- Pfizer C4591001 Protocol — NEJM supplementary materials
- Pfizer C4591001 interim clinical study report (December 2020) — FDA briefing documents, Dec 2020 VRBPAC
- Pfizer booster sub-study protocol (Dec 2020 amendment to C4591001) — ClinicalTrials.gov registration changes / FDA submission
- EU Advance Purchase Agreements (Pfizer/BioNTech) — European Ombudsman OI/4/2022/PB; partial redacted versions on European Commission's transparency page
- European Ombudsman decision OI/4/2022/PB (vdL–Bourla SMS) — ombudsman.europa.eu
- EU Transparency Register — Commissioner meeting logs — ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister
- EU Commission–McKinsey contract (medical countermeasures study) — EU Financial Transparency System / TED
Research follow-ups
-
Anchors the strongest specific claim in the interview (~02:54): the 95% headline was confounded by symptom suppression.
-
Cited at ~13:48 as proof Brussels knew boosters would be required.Sources she cites in the book
- 237 Michele Rivasi (MEP) website — debrief/interview with Christine Cotton on the efficacy of the Pfizer anti-COVID vaccine (May 2022)
- 241 European Parliament multimedia webstreaming — Special Committee on the COVID-19 pandemic (COVI), hearing of 10 October 2022
- 289 European Parliament press room news (12 April 2022) — the Parliament's special committee on COVID-19 (COVI) begins its work
- 290 European Parliament multimedia webstreaming — COVI committee / Policy Department A workshop, 9 March 2023
- 291 L'Humanite (humanite.fr) — video report "Vaccins Pfizer: le scandale des SMS continue" on the von der Leyen–Bourla text messages
-
Cited at ~06:00 — proof that Pfizer was already preparing boosters at the moment of initial authorization.Sources she cites in the book
- 124 FDA media/159195 — VRBPAC briefing document for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in children 6 months through 4 years of age (June 2022), section 6.2 Uncertainties related to benefits
- 136 FDA media/152161 — Pfizer-BioNTech submission/briefing for the COVID-19 vaccine booster (third) dose to the FDA (September 2021)
- 137 Drugs.com / MedNews press release — "Pfizer and BioNTech Receive First U.S. FDA Emergency Use Authorization of a COVID-19 Vaccine Booster" (September 2021); named in prose, no URL given
-
Cited at ~17:32 as evidence of the influence network around the Commission's vaccine strategy.
-
Cited at ~17:32 as exhibit A in the McKinsey-EU-pharma triangle.Sources she cites in the book