Autorisation du vaccin COVID : erreurs ou complicités ?

Virginie Joron · YouTube · Watch ▶

📅 2022-06-13🎙️ Virginie Joron (MEP, Rassemblement National) — episode 2 of a multi-part series📺 Virginie Joron — YouTube channel⏱ 20 min
“No symptoms, no test, no Covid. We have three and a half times more antipyretic use in the vaccine group. That means I'm suppressing symptoms for three times as many people — so the 95% is wrong.”

Key statements

  • The primary efficacy endpoint — PCR-confirmed symptomatic COVID — is biased because symptom-reporting is participant-driven and antipyretics (paracetamol etc.) were permitted, suppressing symptoms. ▶ 01:46
    Sources: Pfizer C4591001 Protocol
  • Vaccine-group participants took antipyretics 3.5× more often than placebo-group participants. With suppressed symptoms came suppressed testing — and suppressed COVID case counts — artificially inflating the 95% headline. ▶ 02:36
    Sources: Pfizer C4591001 interim clinical study report (Dec 2020) — antipyretic use tables
  • PCR-confirmed symptomatic COVID is not representative of real-world infection. Anti-nucleocapsid serology — which would have caught asymptomatic and undetected cases — was not used to define the endpoint. ▶ 05:05
    Sources: Pfizer C4591001 Protocol
  • Pre-clinical monkey data and Phase 1-2 human data already showed neutralizing antibody decline after two months. In Phase 3, Pfizer performed no antibody titre measurement at three months — the time-point that would have shown waning protection. ▶ 05:39
    Sources: Pfizer C4591001 Protocol (immunogenicity schedule)
  • Pfizer was already studying a booster dose in December 2020 — the same month it was telling the public a two-dose regimen would restore normal life. They knew protection wouldn't last. ▶ 06:46
    Sources: Pfizer booster sub-study protocol (Dec 2020 amendment to C4591001)
  • GCP guidelines require extreme traceability (every data entry signed, audited server-room access, redundant air conditioning). All of that regulation, designed to protect trial participants and the public, was disregarded in the COVID trials. ▶ 11:11
    Sources: ICH-GCP guidelines
  • The European Commission ordered 4.2 billion doses for 447 million Europeans — roughly 8-9 doses per person. The order itself proves Brussels knew, from the start, that boosters would be needed. ▶ 14:07
    Sources: EU Advance Purchase Agreements (Pfizer/BioNTech)
  • Cotton flags the European Ombudsman's investigation into Ursula von der Leyen's undisclosed SMS messages with Pfizer's CEO Albert Bourla — still unresolved at recording. ▶ 17:32
    Sources: European Ombudsman decision OI/4/2022/PB
  • The Commission awarded McKinsey a 2.5 million euro contract for a 70-page report on "manufacturing options for medical countermeasures against serious cross-border health threats" during the crisis. ▶ 18:06
    Sources: EU Commission–McKinsey contract (2022, medical countermeasures study)
  • Conflict-of-interest pattern: vdL's son works at McKinsey; her husband is a senior officer of a Maastricht-region pharmaceutical company in the Pfizer network. The EU Transparency Register also shows recurring vdL meetings with Bill Gates, Global Citizen, and Open Society. ▶ 18:44
    Sources: EU Transparency Register (vdL meeting log)

Documents cited

  • Pfizer C4591001 Protocol — NEJM supplementary materials
  • Pfizer C4591001 interim clinical study report (December 2020) — FDA briefing documents, Dec 2020 VRBPAC
  • Pfizer booster sub-study protocol (Dec 2020 amendment to C4591001) — ClinicalTrials.gov registration changes / FDA submission
  • EU Advance Purchase Agreements (Pfizer/BioNTech) — European Ombudsman OI/4/2022/PB; partial redacted versions on European Commission's transparency page
  • European Ombudsman decision OI/4/2022/PB (vdL–Bourla SMS) — ombudsman.europa.eu
  • EU Transparency Register — Commissioner meeting logs — ec.europa.eu/transparencyregister
  • EU Commission–McKinsey contract (medical countermeasures study) — EU Financial Transparency System / TED

Research follow-ups