Actualité de la semaine et invitée exceptionnelle, la biostatisticienne Christine COTTON
📅 2022-02-11🎙️ Martine Wonner (MP, physician) and Steve Ohana (host)📺 Ensemble Pour Les Libertés⏱ 68 min
“No symptoms, no test, no Covid. In the vaccine group, 3 to 4 times more people took antipyretics. So I suppress symptoms — no test, no Covid. My 95% is wrong.”
Key statements
-
The biostatistician is the guarantor of an essai's methodology — calculating the sample size, writing the protocol, running the analyses. Doctors are not equipped to read the resulting tables; they typically call statisticians for help. ▶ 40:07Sources: ICH-GCP guidelines
-
The 95% efficacy headline comes from a primary endpoint defined as a first occurrence of PCR-confirmed symptomatic COVID counted seven days after dose 2 — a participant-driven case definition. ▶ 44:21Sources: Pfizer C4591001 Protocol
-
Symptoms triggered by the vaccine itself (chills, fever, diarrhea, vomiting) overlap with COVID symptoms. Doctors couldn't tell them apart, so testing was often skipped — "no test, no Covid." ▶ 46:47Sources: Pfizer C4591001 Protocol
-
Vaccine-arm participants took antipyretics roughly 3 to 4 times more often than placebo. Suppressed symptoms meant no testing — and the headline 95% efficacy figure is therefore wrong. ▶ 47:29Sources: Pfizer C4591001 interim clinical study report (Dec 2020) — antipyretic use tables
-
The second major problem: no antibody titre measurement at three months post-dose 2. Had Pfizer measured at that timepoint, the waning of protection would have been visible before September 2021's booster announcement. ▶ 48:50Sources: Pfizer C4591001 Protocol (immunogenicity schedule)
-
Participants were supposed to be followed 24 months. Interim analyses leading to marketing authorization for an accelerated-development product after only three months of follow-up is, in Cotton's words, unprecedented. ▶ 49:24Sources: Pfizer C4591001 Protocol
-
An October 2021 report on the 5-11 trial explicitly states the sample size is too small to detect myocarditis. Small samples can't surface rare serious harms — which makes post-authorization follow-up all the more crucial. ▶ 51:50Sources: Pfizer C4591001 pediatric (5-11 yrs) clinical study report (October 2021)
-
Maddie de Garay, a 12-15 trial participant, suffered 35 adverse events and is now wheelchair-bound with a gastric feeding tube. Her serious adverse event is not in the clinical report. ▶ 52:37Sources: Pfizer C4591001 pediatric (12-15 yrs) clinical study report
-
Senator Ron Johnson is collecting adverse-event testimony from trial victims who otherwise have no recourse, and Cotton notes there is pressure to silence such victims. ▶ 53:13Sources: Sen. Ron Johnson testimony series (US Senate)
-
Real-world protection lasts about four months — meaning a booster every four months. The HAS December 2020 advisory already noted Pfizer was studying boosters at that time. ▶ 54:01Sources: HAS opinion (December 2020) on Comirnaty
-
These vaccines were not designed to block transmission. HAS and ANSM both confirm transmission was not studied in the trial — anyone claiming otherwise is engaged in disinformation. ▶ 55:19Sources: Pfizer C4591001 Protocol; HAS opinion on Comirnaty
-
A Santé publique France preprint shared on her Twitter shows the booster has no significant effect under age 80 — undercutting the pass vaccinal's stated public-health rationale. ▶ 59:50Sources: Santé publique France preprint (booster effectiveness)
-
The Comirnaty package leaflet states pregnant women should be vaccinated only if benefits outweigh risks — i.e., case-by-case. Cotton was publicly attacked (by LREM MP Coralie Dubost) for sharing this official notice. ▶ 01:01:02Sources: Comirnaty SmPC / package leaflet
-
Cotton's report concluded with a formal demand for suspension of the vaccine. The Quebec lawyer who commissioned the report was, ten days after pleading, ordered to undergo a psychiatric evaluation. ▶ 01:02:50Sources: Cotton — January 2022 expertise report
Documents cited
- Pfizer C4591001 Protocol — NEJM supplementary materials
- Pfizer C4591001 interim clinical study report (December 2020) — FDA briefing documents, Dec 2020 VRBPAC
- Pfizer C4591001 pediatric clinical study reports (12-15 yrs; 5-11 yrs, Oct 2021) — FDA briefing documents
- Comirnaty SmPC / package leaflet — EMA EPAR archive / ANSM
- HAS opinion on Comirnaty (December 2020) — Haute Autorité de Santé
- Cotton — Expertise report (January 2022) — christinecotton.com
- Santé publique France preprint (booster effectiveness) — shared on Cotton's Twitter feed
Research follow-ups
-
Cited at ~51:50 as the strongest pediatric-trial admission.Sources she cites in the book
- 76 FDA — Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 clinical data for adolescents (12-15 yrs) / Maddie de Garay SAE narrative, FDA media document (April 2021)
- 74 FDA — Pfizer/BioNTech clinical report for adolescents aged 12-15 and young people under 25, FDA media document (released April 2021)
- 123 FDA — Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine pediatric (6 months-4 years / under-5) clinical data, FDA media document (2022)
- 115 FDA — Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine 5-11 years FDA briefing/clinical document presented to VRBPAC, FDA media document (26 October 2021)
- 116 FDA — Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine 5-11 years FDA briefing/clinical document presented to VRBPAC, FDA media document (26 October 2021)
- 117 FDA — Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) October 26, 2021 meeting announcement
- 118 ClinicalTrials.gov — Pfizer/BioNTech pediatric trial C4591007 (NCT04816643), registry record
-
Cited at ~59:50 as undercutting the public-health rationale for the pass vaccinal.
-
Mentioned ~01:01:02 — useful for a future entry on official labels vs public messaging.Sources she cites in the book
- EMA — Comirnaty EPAR Summary of Product Characteristics / Product Information (current, undated version)
- EMA — Comirnaty EPAR Product Information / SmPC, archived version of 24 December 2020 (via Wayback Machine)
- 48 EMA — Pfizer Comirnaty Risk Management Plan (RMP) summary, 25 December 2020 (archived via Wayback Machine)
- 246 HAS (Haute Autorité de Santé) — Vaccination strategy: place of the mRNA vaccine Comirnaty (BNT162b2), opinion of December 2020 (modified February 2021) ⧉ archived
- 247 UK Government (MHRA) — Summary Public Assessment Report for Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, section 3.4 Toxicology ⧉ archived
-
Cited at ~01:02:50 — Cotton presents the timing as a coincidence but flags it as troubling.