Nicolas Dupont-Aignan [00:01] Hello to all of you, today an exceptional moment. I wanted to share with you. I received Mrs. Cotton, who is a biostatistician, who wrote a book, I take it, absolutely remarkable about the health catastrophe of the vaccines against Covid. And the interest of this book is that it is a woman who has carried out clinical trials all her life. So, it’s not someone who’s going to talk to you in the air, it’s someone who knows his subject and tells us in this book that I recommend you, a lot of things. So, it’s a little amateur. Because I’ve received you and I’ve been thinking, I need to make a direct. I can’t leave such a word like that in the secret of my office. Just tell us what you meant with this book.

Christine Cotton [00:52] So this book I wrote for the victims of the Covid-19 vaccines that are extremely numerous and I personally as biostatistician and former director of a research contract specialist of the clinical trials of the management of the data of the clinical trials I have therefore written an expert of the clinical trial Pfizer that demonstrates that this trial has a number of serious deficiencies and methodological biases, it is the vocabulary of statistician, invalidating the results. So what I asked for is an audit of all the participating centres to prove whether these results are valid or not.

Dupont-Aignan [01:32] You say very serious things in your marketing authorizations were made from three-month clinical trials instead of two years, because it was necessary to go. You say that pregnant women, immunocompromised women over 75 years of age have not been included in clinical trials. However, we have been vaccinated after pregnant women, immunocompromised women, over 75 years of age. And you say, then this is the icing on the cake, on the tragedy, that the severe cases, the statistics in fact did not show the effectiveness on the severe cases, not to mention the transmission that has not been tested. What Pfizer acknowledged after before the European Parliament.

Cotton [02:09] Exactly. In fact, what I demonstrate on the basis of, if only from the analysis of the first report in December 2020, there was no statistically demonstrated effect on severe cases, no demonstrated effect on the 75+ years. Pregnant women were not included. There were a number of populations that are at risk populations that do not have results, i.e. pregnant women, immunocompromised patients, patients with co-morbidities. There was no study of transmission, no study of asymptomatic cases, no results on co-administration with another vaccine. and long-term safety was unknown as these results were provided on an interim three-month follow-up analysis. So on the basis of that, when you are told it’s safe and effective, it’s effective on a criterion that has biases and validating its result and it’s sure over a period of three months with serious side effects that are not in the data when we know that

Dupont-Aignan [03:10] This is the second part of this book. And for those who have just joined us, I remind you, Christine Cotton, all vaccinated, all protected, question mark, chronicle of a health disaster announced by Guy Très Daniel, editor. You can get it everywhere. Read it, it’s impressive. And then, the second point that is much more serious is that you tell us, the effectiveness, the clinical trials are not valid, but the worst thing is the dangers, the risks, that masked them.

Cotton [03:44] So, the side effects have been certain. We know that they are missing in the database. Hence again the interest of conducting an audit to see if this practice has been limited to a few centres or if it is generally, we will say, a way to proceed in this trial since we recruited 36,000 patients extremely quickly. We know that clinical development takes 10 years, between the time we sequence SARS-CoV-2, the virus, in January 2020 and when we market the vaccine, we’re 9 months old. How do you want us to do a job in 9 months that we used to take 10 years to do and that this job is right? So it’s called small arrangements with good clinical practice to put this product on the market.

Dupont-Aignan [04:26] But concretely on the effects, you were talking about… you have several cases that are not… very serious that have not been put into the results.

Cotton [04:33] Exactly.

Dupont-Aignan [04:34] You have proof of that.

Cotton [04:35] We have proof of that because it was young people who made their voices heard, so if only these cases should alert the health authorities, for example. We have the Augusto Roo case in Argentina which is a lawyer who almost died during the clinical trial, who alerted me, I have his full medical record, who alerted the authorities, he made letters, everyone doesn’t care. That is, we act as if these people didn’t exist. Maddy of Gary in the United States, a teenager, who had 35 volumes, who was heard by Senator Ron Johnson on a wheelchair with a gastric probe, this case is not described as in the teen test.

Dupont-Aignan [05:11] I have a parenthesis, Ron Johnson, with whom I am in liaison, who is a very brave senator and who is advancing in the United States the search for the culprits of this monstrosity, and the commission of inquiry is very important.

Cotton [05:26] That is, why you need a commission of inquiry? Because you have to determine whether the risks and benefits have been properly established. So we have two concerns with that. That is, you have contracts that were signed at the time on the basis of deaths that were so-called valid and which therefore relieve the labs of their responsibilities.

Dupont-Aignan [05:46] Since I remind you all that in the signature of the hidden contracts, Mrs van der Leyen does not want to publish them, it is known, however, that the pharmaceutical laboratories have abandoned the responsibility not transferred to the states, that is to say that the states have released the laboratories from all responsibility. And what you’re saying is that if it turns out that clinical trials were fraudulent, it would mean that states are no longer responsible and can turn against laboratories.

Cotton [06:16] But completely. Why do states, with our taxes, take care of adverse effects? Victims that absolutely have to be taken care of because there are people who are going very badly, while the trials are not valid. So there is this. And there’s the second problem, it’s that by making us cranium stuffing with data by experts without expertise, people are losing confidence, I see myself since I’m a lot on social networks, in health authorities. So tomorrow let’s admit that we have a very serious pandemic for the coup, that it’s not the Covid pandemic, since it’s still not very deadly, the Covid we know, and that we have a vaccine for example already on the market. Who’s going to get vaccinated today? So that means it’s even a national security risk. No one has any confidence in television, in the media, in prison doctors, or in health authorities. So I alerted the OPECST, the senators and the MPs to whom I presented this expertise that I wrote in January 2022. I told them, you’re losing the confidence of the people, it’s very serious for the future.

Dupont-Aignan [07:23] Listen, thank you, because you see it, on this file, I wish we were critical, but always on a scientific basis. And that’s why, whether it’s Alexandre Henrioncaud and his very depressing work, why yours? That is why Senator Johnson’s work in the United States, my work in a certain way, that of Mrs Joron, that of Mrs Rivasi in the European Parliament, Laurence Muller Brown in the Senate. I would have liked to write your preface. It’s no big deal, we don’t care. It’s very good, it’s brave women, women are braver than men. In any case, I am happy to have received you today, to have shared this with you, to broadcast this video, to broadcast it because there is a lot in this book and to read this book, there is everything in it. To those who do not believe you, read it. And since they said earlier, inquire for yourself to those who do not believe you, who do not believe us. Go see.

Cotton [08:25] There are all the links, you just have to click. There is the date when it was recorded. There is everything. Here, for the elucubrations, it is not a good book to look for.

Dupont-Aignan [08:33] That’s it, thank you to that woman of science.

Cotton [08:35] Thank you very much.