Bumper [00:00] Don’t miss anything, subscribe now!

André Bercoff [00:20] Hi Christine Cotton. So tell me your book, it’s a jacuz, but it’s definitely longer than what Emile Zola did. So you don’t make lace, but it’s an exciting book. It is an exciting book, all vaccinated, all protected, which appeared in Guy Trédaniel editions, because you, You take the time and you take the skill and I would like to remind you who Christine Cotton is for those who would not know her. And you present her very well moreover at the end of your book. You’ve got, I’m going to take back what you’re saying yourself. And when you say I am Christine Cotton, you are a biostatistician, you have been president of the society, you have worked with all the laboratories, but I would like Christine Cotton to start because we define things well and precisely all the definitions and studies, what is it that being biostatistician in medical and health matters?

Christine Cotton [01:26] The biostatistician is the one who writes the methodology of clinical trials during the writing of the protocol, the famous document that we will write upstream of any medical research. So we’re going to write this down with the lab staff, with some experts in the field, and we’re going to do a number of topics to figure out how many people we need in the clinical trial, for example, we want to do. We’re going to define the analytical criteria that are generally relevant to the disease. This document will be submitted to health agencies for permission to test. Once the trial begins, we have a whole part that is therefore the recruitment of participants, the management of data. which was also a part that I managed in my contract research company, which I sold in 2018.

Bercoff [02:15] “And for 23 years, you’ve been organic… well, you’ve… taken care of this, biostatistics.

Cotton [02:20] As a biostatistician, I myself formed the company as a biostatistician, I became, in fact, head of a research company under contract, which therefore managed the data, i.e. what is known as data management and statistical analysis. So it is the biostatisticians who do the statistics of clinical trials, do not dislike some who continue to believe for the doctors.

Bercoff [02:50] Yeah, it’s not doctors who do this, it’s biostatisticians.

Cotton [02:55] No doctor has ever returned any results.

Bercoff [02:57] So Christine Cotton, if I understand correctly, correct me if I’m wrong, you’re an upstream of all this, it’s before any clinical trial starts, you’re there right from the start.

Cotton [03:10] We’re upstream and we’re intervening, especially when we’re managing trial data because we need reliable data, and we’re at the end because we’re giving back the results, and we’re working with the doctor in general who’s going to write the famous report that we’re going to submit to the agencies to ask for permission.

Bercoff [03:28] No, authorisation to make the vaccine first.

Cotton [03:33] So, marketing authorisation.

Bercoff [03:36] Yes, all right. That’s right. And so you’re inescapable, and finally biostatisticians in particular, you’re inescapable in this process. So exactly, you tell, and honestly your book reads like a thriller, you tell yourself, you tell yourself, well you took care of it, then at some point you took your distance, and then you come across what is happening with the Covid-19 announcement and the announcement of the messenger RNA vaccine. And there, you repeatedly say that you miss falling from your chair.

Cotton [04:11] So because what I found in this clinical trial, I didn’t expect to find it at all, since any biomedical research, especially on human subjects, must follow very strict rules that are laid down by a consortium to which all health agencies have joined almost all over the world. So it makes it possible to homogenize work practices so that everyone works, everyone works the same way, and to frame all the activities of all the stakeholders. In my experience as a contract research director, I had x audits, many audits of large laboratories. who came to check our method of work to be sure that the results provided were correct, that we cannot afford to be wrong. So we have validation process processes, we have standard operating procedures, like ISO 9001 to follow. And all the players, be it the one who recruits the participant, the nurse who injects the products, the nurse who takes the blood for blood tests, the data manager who manages the data, the biostatistician, everything is framed, documented, plotted. So I did not expect at all to find a trial, we will say, of this mediocrity.

Bercoff [05:35] So let’s just talk about it, because you’re telling us about the dates, the dates of December 2020. First, indeed, December 2020, we started to have the first appearances actually in the vaccine market. I would say permission, the AMM, etc. So we announce 95% efficiency and already it makes you react to this efficiency, this 95% efficiency announcement. Why does it make you react?

Cotton [06:12] — No, what makes me react in the first place is the time of development. When you know that a time of development of a product lasts between 10 and 15 years, between the moment when China sequenced SARS-CoV-2 in March 2020 and the moment when you accept the Pfizer vaccine on the market, you have 9 months. So already, you think it was very fast to make a phase… “And Christine Cotton, is that what I’ve never seen?

Bercoff [06:33] When you say, all the vaccines in history so far are between 5, 10 and 15 years old.

Cotton [06:40] No, no, it’s never seen, since there, to allow such a rapid development, we start a phase, so a clinical trial phase, while the previous one is not yet finished. That is, you don’t have all your results on phase 1, the first one where toxicity is tested, and you already start phase 2. You haven’t finished your phase 2, you’re starting phase 3, so phase 3, it’s the one that gave rise to these famous 95% efficiency.

Bercoff [07:04] That’s what is digging, obviously, few people can do this, we, in any case, it’s not within our reach, nor within our possibilities. You do it, we’re going to talk about it precisely, because 4.25%, 0.424% is not exactly the same number, that’s the least we can say. We’re meeting again, Christine Cotton, with you.

Station ID [07:27] And you want to question Christine Cotton about her book, all vaccinated, all protected. You call us at 0826 300 300, we’re waiting for your calls. We’ll be right back on South Radio, 0826 300 300. Right away. Here, South Radio.

Bumper [07:42] The French speak French. I don’t like the wordboard.

Bumper [07:55] I don’t like the wordboard.

Bercoff [08:00] All vaccinated, all protected with a point to question. It is the book, it is the work of Christine Cotton, of biostatistician Christine Cotton, who has just appeared at Guy Trédaniel and… The subtitle is “Chronicle d’une catastrophe sanitaire annoncée”. You don’t go there on a case-by-case basis, Christine Cotton, so as you move forward, you’ve studied, you’re going to look, you’ve obviously got the instruments, you’re 25 years behind you in practice, 23 years, you’ve looked at all this. And you say basically, you actually talk about time, you say how we made something very very very quickly that for the other vaccines is a never seen, took a lot more time. You looked at what was actually said, efficiency absolutely, and the famous vaccine all protected, that was what a number of ministers and authorities had said on radios and televisions. At first it was absolutely and if you don’t, and then you talk a lot about the difference, I would say, the almost abyssal influence. And I would like to talk about that, about a number of people like you, you also mention other people, you’re obviously not alone. And the speech, in the radios, the televisions, in any case in the 4-5th, you were saying, but on the one hand there’s this thing, we saw the QR code, we saw the trilogy you’re talking about, the famous QR code trilogy, vaccines, etc. And then you say, but we don’t understand, there’s really, I’d say, a gap between what I, Christine Cotton, I see, and what I see saying and practicing and doing.

Cotton [09:53] So, to reframe the discussion a bit, we wonder how we could say, all vaccinated, all protected, on the basis of the outcome of a clinical trial that never studied transmission. And then, as of December 2020, we have all the results that are available, all the deliberations on the FDA chain, so the agency in the United States that gives the authorizations.

Bercoff [10:19] Food and Drug Administration, yes.

Cotton [10:21] And the beginning, the risk management plan, and so in fact what we know about these 95%, is that this effectiveness only concerns mild or moderate cases, confirmed by PCR test. Then, it is known in this December report that there is no proven efficacy on severe cases, and it is known that there is no demonstrated efficacy over 75 years.

Bercoff [10:46] But Mr Gauton, this is December 2020, as we know from December 2020.

Cotton [10:50] Here, and here you have a speech that is put in place, that everyone needs to be vaccinated, so first the elderly, then we have the clinical reports that come out for the teenagers, the 12-15, then we have on the children the 5-11, then we have the babies, and we have systematically this reproduction of the same method, we do three-month follow-up analyses with half of the patients followed less than two. And how do you want us to conclude on the basis of that, on tolerance, even in the medium term?

Bercoff [11:29] Christine Cotton, when you say “we don’t know,” all the cases you mentioned, on such immunodepressants, on such, we don’t know, they haven’t been examined? The history of pregnant women, for example, there hasn’t been any research on this, anything?

Cotton [11:47] So that’s normal, pregnant women are always excluded from clinical trials, they’re part of the protected populations.

Bercoff [11:54] All right.

Cotton [11:54] There is the clinical trial that was specifically done on these enclosures whose results have never been achieved, yet the study was completed, the trial by Pfizer was completed in July 2022. No results, that is, there are no results of clinical trials on the populations I have just mentioned to you.

Bercoff [12:13] All right.

Cotton [12:14] If I can continue, there is this gap between pure statistics, reality, anyone who knows a little about it to open up the documents and see what I’m talking about, and we have a speech next door that is then supported by a whole bunch of what I’m going to call trolls, because you’ve seen that I’m devoting a fairly substantial chapter to them, so we’re being subjected to a whole bunch of constant harassment, defamation that challenges degrees, insults, because I’ve been called a whore, a bitch, I’m passing you on. So there’s no element in all of this that’s factual, statistical, method, it’s just a bunch of trolls recruited from the trash bottoms. I often put them for their failed life and their failed career and their rotten life.

Bercoff [13:16] I see you’re mad at them.

Cotton [13:20] What’s very important to know is that we notice that all these stalkers on social media are connected with doctors on stage, are linked to journalists, are linked to politicians, so basically what happened? We’re gonna say this case was those Covid vaccines, it was completely politicized, so I’m sorry, science is not politics, it’s not right or left, it’s instinct.

Bercoff [13:54] That’s exactly what we’re going to do, we’re going to talk about these famous side effects, the pharmacovigilance, all this, VAERS, these companies. Because precisely when the wave or waves arrived, not the waves at the micron and company, but the waves of the side effects or the effects actually side effects, there I would like to talk about it really Christine Cotton, that’s the basis of your book too and you’ve traced this a little bit. What’s going on about it? Well, the same thing, the same steps, right away with you, all vaccinated, all protected.

Station ID [14:32] And you call us at 0826 300 300 to question Christine Coteau on her book. All vaccinated, all protected by Guy Très Daniel editions. 0826 300 300, we’ll meet right away.

Bumper [14:47] This is Sud Radio. The French speak French. The carrots are cooked.

Bumper [15:01] The carrots are cooked.

Bercoff [15:02] And I’m not the only one, Christine Cotton, and for three years, maybe before in all these states, all vaccinated, all protected, question mark. Christine Cotton, I just want to read an excerpt from your book, quick. Two things, the opinion of the High Health Authority of February 2, 2021, so more than a year ago, authorizing AstraZeneca’s AZD1-1222 vaccine, stated that the High Health Authority noted, however, that at this stage, the data did not make it possible to conclude that the vaccine was effective in people 65 years of age and older. and on the severe forms, on the asymptomatic forms. That is, the High Authority of Health and not just Christine Cotton or other doctors treated with all the names. And then, another thing, the Food and Drug Administration you have already mentioned, had asked to keep the documents relating to clinical trials secret for 75 years. And that could actually have been overturned by an American judge, that’s right.

Cotton [16:09] Yes, these documents made public are very interesting because we have a lot of data in there and we mostly have the database of the clinical trial. So when we are biostatistician like me, we get this database and we recalculate. And then, when we recalculate on a criterion called anti-nucleocapside serology, which allows you to know who had Covid during the trial or who didn’t, you find about 55% effectiveness.

So you see that already your effectiveness is dependent on the criterion that was chosen. Why this result was never presented in the reports? Exactly. So these are documents that are on the IDF website and that we still find today. In fact, the thing that the people who listen to us need to understand is that in this book you have all the links on everything. That is, the media bluff, it’s not in my book that you need to look for it. The blabla that comes out of nowhere without relying on any source or jerking sources, it is not at my home that it is necessary So there are all the links on all the docs, be it the FDA for the United States, the European Agency for Europe, the ANSM for France, the HAAS Health Authority, all the links are available. You can read with your own eyes what I’m telling you.

Bercoff [17:29] And then you have, but we’re going to talk about it later, testimonies from people who lost either their child, or other intimates quite terrible and striking, by the way.

Cotton [17:42] Yes, so it was for them that I agreed to write this book, because I don’t intend to write a book. And when the publisher contacted me, it was to give the victims the floor, as it may have been over a year and a half since I worked with victims. So that’s what I did. That’s right, I wanted those people who for some people are ill-treated, have been mistreated by the medical profession, badly, far from treatment and ill-treated by the medical profession.

Bercoff [18:10] It hasn’t changed anything, it’s worth calling the senator or the National Agency.

Cotton [18:15] In fact, we are awaiting the final report of the Senators and MPs of OPECST, whose interim version was released in June 2022. The final version is scheduled for October. So maybe if they want to take victims home on vacation or pay for their care, the multiple food supplements they’re trying to take to get better, because the medical staff is flouting it, or paying someone to come and take care of it at home, well, we need money. They need money.

Bercoff [18:47] So Christine Cotton, what do you answer to those who say, and there are many, who say yes, but the ones you’re talking about are a minority, we’ve vaccinated 3 billion people, if not 4 billion people, and still look, there’s not 3 billion or 4 billion coffins. You know, we hear a lot, a lot of that also by saying, yes, okay, there have been problems, but finally, don’t we inflate? Do the Christine Cotton, the Perronnes and others not inflate this number? What do you answer to that?

Cotton [19:21] Since you have only reported 1.2 million cases to the European Agency for the monovalent vaccine, we know that there is a strong under-reporting and that perhaps this number has to be multiplied by 12, by 10 pardons, or perhaps even more. So now the trend, as we see on the networks, is the vaccine, we must not talk about it anymore, it is a gnaw. Yes, it may be a way of trying to escape responsibility, but no, no, no, there’s a whole chain of responsibilities in all this, in the way we’ve accepted these far too easy products.

Bercoff [19:55] Besides, you’re thinking that the balance between profit and risk is not the same as we’ve been told.

Cotton [20:01] How many people were affected by Covid mortality? In fact, we knew in December 2020, and so it was the most virulent virus, the most affected were the elderly. All right, we know, the elderly people are the ones who die the most. So the children, they had very little risk of being hospitalized or dying. Babies, we vaccinate babies from six months and we tell you we have to give them three doses. What’s the risk of a baby dying? And what’s the list of all the side effects they can have? And that’s really short-term. Because what you see in the reports is short-term, long-term. What are the effects, the potential diseases these people can develop? We don’t know, nobody knows. It’s called risk taking.

Bercoff [20:48] It’s a real risk taking, but then you, you go, Christine Cotton, you go to say, you’re not the only one, you’ve quoted a number of American, Indian and other teachers, you’re in favour of a moratorium, I’d say even more of a halt to vaccination, of this vaccination.

Cotton [21:06] What I wrote in my written expertise in January 2022, I asked for a temporary stop in order to do an audit. I said that it is necessary to suspend to do an audit to see how it happened in clinical trials since the more these databases come out, the more we can do calculations and the more we perceive that there are things that are not right. What is wisdom even in fact, I didn’t say they’re all crooks we have to put them in jail, I said we have to go check on the sites how people worked to find out if the data and therefore the results are reliable and if it isn’t. We have statements that have made orders by signing contracts that exempt the labs from their responsibility, if the tests are unreliable, and we pass to the caisse all the laboratories, because there is no reason for taxpayers to pay for adverse effects on the basis of tests that are conducted.

Bercoff [22:08] “Yes, that’s what you’re explaining.”

Cotton [22:09] – So why don’t the agencies audit?

Bercoff [22:11] “In any case, a lot of people, it’s true.

Cotton [22:15] Yes, go ahead, go ahead. “Yes, yes, and that’s it. So there are a lot of questions to ask on the basis of results. And when we have an objective eye and that quite factual, as I’ve done since the beginning, you, instead of having a reaction on the other side that is, we’re going to say, sensible and professional, you have a degenerate gang that attacks you by telling you that you don’t have a Bac plus 5, that you get on your resume and that you’re a whore to say that there are problems. No, but, I mean, we really live in a crazy world, I’m telling you.

Bercoff [22:54] Well, we’re not living in a freaky world, they’re defending their biftec.

Cotton [22:58] Yeah, yeah, well, we’re gonna drag them to court, so believe me, one day I’ll have the pleasure of seeing their heads degenerate.

Bercoff [23:05] While waiting for Christine Cotton, I say that you really are reading this book, take the time to read it, it’s an extremely happy book, which is a big book, important to take, actually, the least of things, the time to look at it, to read it, and then we discuss it. And as you say, we audit. As we’re auditing you today, Christine Cotton, for your book. We have several listeners who have questions to ask you, who want to intervene. Lucien?

Station ID [23:34] Yes, many listeners call us at 0826 300 300 and you continue to call us at 0826 300 300. You can have the floor and we welcome Émilien de Haras who would like to talk to us about the side effects.

Caller [23:45] Hello Emilia. Hello André, hello to your guest. Thank you for taking me back on a large antenna again. I had already intervened some time ago to explain my situation a little bit. I will resiglidate you a little bit the context. I, I am a professional firefighter, was under a vaccination obligation by the health law that had passed in August 2021. Beyond the statistics, in fact, today, behind, it’s the human, in addition to numbers. Today, it’s the lives that have turned for thousands of people. And for these people, like me, we’re actually in the most complete wandering.

Bercoff [24:26] We don’t exist. You know, a lot of people call us, and it’s important, you exposed it, so Christine Cotton, there are Emilians, there are many, there are actually men and women. How do you react to that? Besides, you have some, you have some testimonials in your book, of course.

Cotton [24:42] Yeah, well, I hear stories like that every week, people who, as a result, found themselves on the tile, who can’t work anymore, who find themselves in complicated financial situations, or not.

Bercoff [24:53] Has it been, has it been, has it been, has it been, for the sake of security, because it is important for everyone, has it established, by the use of the drug-vigilance, established causal links, or not, for the moment?

Cotton [25:06] “So, as you speak with victims, you have had some who have had the formal recognition of the link.

Bercoff [25:13] - Yes, but not pharmacovigilance.

Cotton [25:17] No, by pharmacovigilance. They have had formal recognition of the link. That is, there is nothing else that can explain their condition, apart from the vaccine.

Bercoff [25:26] We’ll meet right after this last little break with the Singotans and our listeners.

Station ID [25:32] I’ll see you in a minute, and you’ll keep calling us at 0826 300 300.

Bumper [25:38] This is Sud Radio. The French speak French. I don’t like the word blanquette.

Bumper [25:48] I don’t like the word blanquette.

Station ID [25:54] You are well in the face-to-face of André Bercoff with Christine Cotton for his book All vaccinated, all protected, Covid-19 vaccines, chronicle of a health disaster announced. You have the floor 0826 300 300. We welcome Christophe de Angers. Hello Christophe.

Caller [26:08] Hello Christophe. Hello André. Good morning Mrs Cotton. Thank you for your publicity. I wanted to say that perhaps one day in the newspaper of France 2, we will hear about the texts of Ursula von Leyen, the BioNTech trial in Germany, the beds of Madame Cotton, Pierre Chaillot and others and that is not the case and I believe that the balance of power for the moment, it is really in our disfavor. And I think it might also take us to caress each other, but it’s also, André, I’m asking you about it, it’s that Mrs. Cotton, it’s organizing what there were very long ago, disputes, that is, confrontations should be archived, radio or video, we don’t think the same thing, because what we have? Everyone makes their YouTube channel, their network. We have columnists who invite for example Raoult or others, and then it’s always the same thing. Personally, I would dream, in quotation marks, that we have arguments in debates between specialists, organized intelligently, not sometimes in point, or something that is created there, because otherwise, we are led to be in the bench.

Bercoff [27:19] Yes, everyone in his tribe, I understand what you’re saying.

Caller [27:22] It’s a secret, almost, and I understand Mrs. Cotton’s insults, all this is disgusting, but that’s how it is now and not I really wish there was a slightly different media coverage but I think you can organize it in any case free media maybe I don’t know that’s what you want to say thank you.

Bercoff [27:42] Thank you Christine Cotton, have you been invited to debates with a certain number of doctors of researchers or even labs you who have very long and frequented the labs, you have worked not for them but with them, have you been invited to conflicting debates?

Cotton [28:01] To be able to debate, dear Mr Bercoff, we must have in front of people who know good clinical practice, who have worked in clinical research. Today, people who say they don’t say what I’ve written, you have some kind of oceanographer working with fish, you have some kind of math teacher, and that’s what we’re putting forward. It’s these people that we’re putting forward, which the oceanographer supposedly re-analyzed Raoult’s study, but make me laugh. How can we put forward people who don’t have the skills?

Bercoff [28:35] I’m sorry Christine, Christine Cotton, you still have other people than you who studied, who had worked, who had practiced. I mean seriously, there are still some.

Cotton [28:44] Of course, but there’s plenty in the pharmaceutical labs.

Bercoff [28:48] Why don’t they argue?

Cotton [28:50] But they don’t argue, but because three quarters are not aware of the problem. I, the people I had on the phone following me on the LinkedIn network before they suspended my account, because precisely, that’s what I wanted to do. I gave up my report by asking for the advice of my colleagues or former clients, by saying, give me your opinion on what I wrote. What did they do? They suspended my account and they never wanted to give it back to me. And what did I have as a visit? The WHO, the national security, the US State Department, Apple, the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Armed Forces, the National Gendarmerie. It is not with these people that we are debating. We are debating with people who have done the same job as you, who know what they are talking about and not with people who don’t understand anything about it because it’s not their job, it’s not their business.

So here we are today in a world where we build as an expert people who have never worked in the field in which they are said to be experts, in which they are said to be experts, and we insult people whose profession it has been for years. Here we are. That’s what I called in my book the inversion of values, the praise of mediocrity. In any case, let them host a quality assurance officer on TV, let them read my book or my expertise, and maybe there we could have discussions between competent people.

Bercoff [30:17] Well, listen, we’re going to try to do this, we’re actually, by choosing people of equal skill, in the meantime, read this book that is far from being or mediocre, or that doesn’t know what it’s talking about, all of it vaccinate, all of it protect. Thank you Christine Cotton.

Cotton [30:33] So I have a little last word to say.

Bercoff [30:35] Go on, go on, quick.

Cotton [30:36] I come back to the responsibility of the labs, and it’s absolutely necessary to do this audit, and I think that all the overactivity of the pharma industry can only make me right. And the health agencies, the same, because there’s still a big problem of compensation for the victims there. And you have to quickly identify whether it’s the lab to pay or not.

Bercoff [31:01] Well listen, in any case it will be conveyed and relayed, and besides there are some states that have already taken this path. See you very soon, we will talk about all this again, and with you too.